|
server
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
netdiag outputs messages regarding DNS server IP of 0.0.0.0have some interesting information. To recap, some NTFRS errors were showing up and machine account passwords weren't replicationg. GPO updates were not working for the secondary DC either. Running netdiag /test:dns /v showed that for each SRV record the primary and secondary DCs thought their DNS server was 0.0.0.0 even though it wasn't. Our configuration is 2 physical onboard NICs configured in a team using a Broadcom utility. A virtual interface therefore exists upon which all network settings are set. This interface has a DNS server IP set which works fine when using nslookup or any other utility (except netdiag). Today I did some more troubleshooting and found out that if I add a secondary DNS server to my DNS server list then the netdiag utility will attempt to query 0.0.0.0 as well as what I originally specified as my primary DNS server as shown by the properties of the Team interface's connection properties. The set of queries going to 0.0.0.0 still fail of course but a second set of queries for each SRV record are sent to our DNS server and return fine. If I add a third DNS server IP then the 2nd DNS IP I added above is used as a 3rd DNS IP in addition to 0.0.0.0 and my primary DNS server IP. We actually only have 1 DNS server IP (load-balanced appliances) so a 2nd DNS server IP isn't needed. So basically, netdiag is trying to use 0.0.0.0 as a DNS IP which causes all subsequent IPs listed (by netdiag) to be off by one when comparing the "used" list to what is configured to be used. The physical NIC properties for the 2 NICS are empty because we have a virtual NIC in use. I don't know where the 0.0.0.0 is coming from though. The 'nameserver' key in the registry is set to our primary DNS server. Still not sure 100% yet whether this is going to fix our replication issues between our domain controllers but I'm hoping it will. I'll know more tomorrow I hope as replication attempts will be made overnight. Any ideas? Thanks Im kind of lost with all that information, but you've set on the DNS Server
properties on which IPs the server will listen to requests? Cheers "Brandon McCombs" <n***@none.com> escribió en el mensaje de noticias:4946f5f6$0$8513$9a6e1***@unlimited.newshosting.com...Show quoteHide quote > I posted this problem a few days ago and nobody responded but today I have > some interesting information. > > To recap, some NTFRS errors were showing up and machine account passwords > weren't replicationg. GPO updates were not working for the secondary DC > either. Running netdiag /test:dns /v showed that for each SRV record the > primary and secondary DCs thought their DNS server was 0.0.0.0 even though > it wasn't. > > Our configuration is 2 physical onboard NICs configured in a team using a > Broadcom utility. A virtual interface therefore exists upon which all > network settings are set. This interface has a DNS server IP set which > works fine when using nslookup or any other utility (except netdiag). > > Today I did some more troubleshooting and found out that if I add a > secondary DNS server to my DNS server list then the netdiag utility will > attempt to query 0.0.0.0 as well as what I originally specified as my > primary DNS server as shown by the properties of the Team interface's > connection properties. The set of queries going to 0.0.0.0 still fail of > course but a second set of queries for each SRV record are sent to our DNS > server and return fine. > > If I add a third DNS server IP then the 2nd DNS IP I added above is used > as a 3rd DNS IP in addition to 0.0.0.0 and my primary DNS server IP. We > actually only have 1 DNS server IP (load-balanced appliances) so a 2nd DNS > server IP isn't needed. > > So basically, netdiag is trying to use 0.0.0.0 as a DNS IP which causes > all subsequent IPs listed (by netdiag) to be off by one when comparing the > "used" list to what is configured to be used. > > The physical NIC properties for the 2 NICS are empty because we have a > virtual NIC in use. I don't know where the 0.0.0.0 is coming from though. > The 'nameserver' key in the registry is set to our primary DNS server. > > Still not sure 100% yet whether this is going to fix our replication > issues between our domain controllers but I'm hoping it will. I'll know > more tomorrow I hope as replication attempts will be made overnight. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks augusto.alvare***@gmail.com wrote:
> Im kind of lost with all that information, but you've set on the DNS Microsoft DNS isn't installed on this machine. We use appliances for > Server properties on which IPs the server will listen to requests? > > Cheers > DNS. ADS points to the appliances for DNS information. The IP of the appliance is in the network properties for the teaming interface on the server but netdiag doesn't want to use it. Other tools have no problem with the DNS being located on an external (to machine) device. SRV records are in the appliance BIND database. Netdiag reports that the DNS server is 0.0.0.0 and therefore can't resolve SRV records when I run 'netdiag /test:dns /v'. If I add in another DNS server IP to the interface properties then netdiag still reports the 0.0.0.0 DNS IP but begins to list the correct DNS Server IP but not until I add that secondary DNS. So at this point I have DNS Server IP1 and DNS Server IP2 but only IP1 is listed in netdiag output because it wants to hold on to 0.0.0.0 from somewhere. If I add a 3rd DNS Server IP (we'll call it IP3) then I'll have IP1, IP2, and IP3 listed as DNS servers on the interface connection properties. But in netdiag output it still only queries 0.0.0.0, IP1, and IP2. Because 0.0.0.0 won't go away netdiag is always missing a DNS IP compared to what is configured for the network interface. All queries to 0.0.0.0 of course fail but the netdiag SRV queries start succeeding as long as I specify another DNS Server IP beyond the only one we should have configured. Note: As a test I'm specifying more than 1 DNS IP but the others are located in parts of the network that these servers shouldn't be using which is why the normal configuration only includes 1 DNS IP. Summary: Current configuration is this: Normal DNS server IP list: 192.168.1.10 Normal (but wrong) NetDiag DNS IP list: 0.0.0.0 (obviously this should match the line above but it doesn't, hence the problem I was troubleshooting) As a test I set this up: Modified DNS Server IP list: 192.168.1.10,192.168.10.11,192.168.20.12 Modified NetDiag DNS IP list: 0.0.0.0,192.168.1.10,192.168.10.11 As you can see, NetDiag lags behind in knowing what DNS IPs to query compared to what the official list of DNS IPs are in my LAN configuration. Does that help? If so, have you seen this before? thanks Brandon Brandon McCombs wrote: Show quoteHide quote >> I posted this problem a few days ago and nobody responded but today I >> have some interesting information. >> >> To recap, some NTFRS errors were showing up and machine account >> passwords weren't replicationg. GPO updates were not working for the >> secondary DC either. Running netdiag /test:dns /v showed that for each >> SRV record the primary and secondary DCs thought their DNS server was >> 0.0.0.0 even though it wasn't. >> >> Our configuration is 2 physical onboard NICs configured in a team using >> a Broadcom utility. A virtual interface therefore exists upon which all >> network settings are set. This interface has a DNS server IP set which >> works fine when using nslookup or any other utility (except netdiag). >> >> Today I did some more troubleshooting and found out that if I add a >> secondary DNS server to my DNS server list then the netdiag utility will >> attempt to query 0.0.0.0 as well as what I originally specified as my >> primary DNS server as shown by the properties of the Team interface's >> connection properties. The set of queries going to 0.0.0.0 still fail of >> course but a second set of queries for each SRV record are sent to our >> DNS server and return fine. >> >> If I add a third DNS server IP then the 2nd DNS IP I added above is used >> as a 3rd DNS IP in addition to 0.0.0.0 and my primary DNS server IP. We >> actually only have 1 DNS server IP (load-balanced appliances) so a 2nd >> DNS server IP isn't needed. >> >> So basically, netdiag is trying to use 0.0.0.0 as a DNS IP which causes >> all subsequent IPs listed (by netdiag) to be off by one when comparing >> the "used" list to what is configured to be used. >> >> The physical NIC properties for the 2 NICS are empty because we have a >> virtual NIC in use. I don't know where the 0.0.0.0 is coming from >> though. The 'nameserver' key in the registry is set to our primary DNS >> server. >> >> Still not sure 100% yet whether this is going to fix our replication >> issues between our domain controllers but I'm hoping it will. I'll know >> more tomorrow I hope as replication attempts will be made overnight. >> >> Any ideas? >> >> Thanks
Event 861 fills event log on newly built Domain Controller
Home folder creation via script profilepath - User Profile Lost Resources how to change from sub.domain.com to domain.com Scripted Drives Password Change AD 2003 and GPO on Windows 2008 GPO for Vista, allow normal User to create shares and to deactiv. Clarification on computer object migration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||