|
server
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
What am I doing wrong? (Want to use Server 2003 R2 for Domain ContThis is going to be extremely newbie-ish and probably long-winded. Sorry for both in advance. I have a server that used to be Server NT 4 running as a Domain Controller *purely* to manage user access to some computers. These computers run Win98, NT4 and 2k and cannot be upgraded. Due to the MS067-08 vulnerability and non-release of a patch for NT4, we need to upgrade the server to Server 2003. I tried a straight "upgrade" and met with lots of failure, so in the end I am going for "clean slate". So far, I have wiped the hard drive and installed Server 2003 R2 and updated it. I have also run dcpromo. I selected the pre-windows 2000 computer option and I let dcpromo install a local DNS server, though it's not necessary. Now here are the catches: 1. I am a small cog at a big university. I do not have direct control over DNS servers. 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be joining this domain already have DNS names that are at the same level as the Domain Controller. I know this isn't a standard setup, which is why I'm here -- I've done Server 2003 and DNS stuff in the past, but not like this, haha. :) Here's the slightly obfuscated example: Server is Server 2003 R2 and "lab-server.university.edu" (yes the server has a hyphen in the name) Computer1 is Win2k and "computer1.university.edu" Computer2 is Win98 and "computer2.university.edu" etc. Domain is called "lab.university.edu"; netbios name is "lab". We have been able to set up an Alias record in DNS to make lab.university.edu the same as lab-server.university.edu. When I try to join the domain computer1, I get the "can't find the domain server; could be a DNS issue go.microsoft.com/fw=5171" -- something to that effect; 5171 is the right error message. What am I doing wrong? I really *only* need a NETBIOS domain, but that's not possible after WinNT Server, right? Do I need SRV and A records in DNS for this to work? What if I can't get those? Thanks in advance... I've been pulling my hair out for a couple of weeks now. I'm just too inexperienced to figure this one out. Best regards, J.R. Raith > 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be Actually AD totally relies on DNS so it can function correctly.> joining Basic DNS setup is Install DNS on the AD server and point the AD DNS server to itself in the properties of tcp/ip. Use the actual IP address not 127.0.0.1. Point ALL AD clients to the DNS server setup for the AD domain ONLY. For Internet acces set up forwarding and list (in your case) the University servers as the forwarders. This is the ONLY place on your AD domain where the University servers should be listed is as a forwarder. AD clients MUST find the DNS SRV records in order to "find" the domain. Pointiong the DNS server to itself for DNS allows the server to register the SRV record in it's DNAS zone. Pointing the clients to the DNS server setup for the AD domain will allow the AD clients to find the SRV record they need to "find" the domain. Remember servers are AD clients also. You are isolating your AD domain from the University domain. You will use your AD DNS server to "find" resources in your AD domain. You will use the University DNS server as a forwarder to find sites on the internet hth DDS Show quoteHide quote "J.R. Raith" <JRRa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4E10A573-DB46-452F-80A0-BB28F9DFD090@microsoft.com... > Hi everyone, > > This is going to be extremely newbie-ish and probably long-winded. Sorry > for > both in advance. > > I have a server that used to be Server NT 4 running as a Domain Controller > *purely* to manage user access to some computers. These computers run > Win98, > NT4 and 2k and cannot be upgraded. > > Due to the MS067-08 vulnerability and non-release of a patch for NT4, we > need to upgrade the server to Server 2003. I tried a straight "upgrade" > and > met with lots of failure, so in the end I am going for "clean slate". > > So far, I have wiped the hard drive and installed Server 2003 R2 and > updated > it. I have also run dcpromo. I selected the pre-windows 2000 computer > option > and I let dcpromo install a local DNS server, though it's not necessary. > > Now here are the catches: > 1. I am a small cog at a big university. I do not have direct control over > DNS servers. > 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be > joining > this domain already have DNS names that are at the same level as the > Domain > Controller. > > I know this isn't a standard setup, which is why I'm here -- I've done > Server 2003 and DNS stuff in the past, but not like this, haha. :) > > Here's the slightly obfuscated example: > > Server is Server 2003 R2 and "lab-server.university.edu" (yes the server > has > a hyphen in the name) > Computer1 is Win2k and "computer1.university.edu" > Computer2 is Win98 and "computer2.university.edu" > etc. > Domain is called "lab.university.edu"; netbios name is "lab". > > We have been able to set up an Alias record in DNS to make > lab.university.edu the same as lab-server.university.edu. > > When I try to join the domain computer1, I get the "can't find the domain > server; could be a DNS issue go.microsoft.com/fw=5171" -- something to > that > effect; 5171 is the right error message. > > What am I doing wrong? I really *only* need a NETBIOS domain, but that's > not > possible after WinNT Server, right? Do I need SRV and A records in DNS for > this to work? What if I can't get those? > > Thanks in advance... I've been pulling my hair out for a couple of weeks > now. I'm just too inexperienced to figure this one out. > > Best regards, > J.R. Raith I am not sure on how your your other servers are connecting to the new server
but you may need WINS turned on to resolve netbios names for Windows 98. or if the servers at the univisity have it on then they will help resolving netbios names. Show quoteHide quote "Danny Sanders" wrote: > > 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be > > joining > > Actually AD totally relies on DNS so it can function correctly. > > Basic DNS setup is Install DNS on the AD server and point the AD DNS server > to itself in the properties of tcp/ip. Use the actual IP address not > 127.0.0.1. Point ALL AD clients to the DNS server setup for the AD domain > ONLY. For Internet acces set up forwarding and list (in your case) the > University servers as the forwarders. This is the ONLY place on your AD > domain where the University servers should be listed is as a forwarder. > > AD clients MUST find the DNS SRV records in order to "find" the domain. > Pointiong the DNS server to itself for DNS allows the server to register the > SRV record in it's DNAS zone. Pointing the clients to the DNS server setup > for the AD domain will allow the AD clients to find the SRV record they need > to "find" the domain. Remember servers are AD clients also. > > You are isolating your AD domain from the University domain. You will use > your AD DNS server to "find" resources in your AD domain. You will use the > University DNS server as a forwarder to find sites on the internet > > hth > DDS > > > > "J.R. Raith" <JRRa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:4E10A573-DB46-452F-80A0-BB28F9DFD090@microsoft.com... > > Hi everyone, > > > > This is going to be extremely newbie-ish and probably long-winded. Sorry > > for > > both in advance. > > > > I have a server that used to be Server NT 4 running as a Domain Controller > > *purely* to manage user access to some computers. These computers run > > Win98, > > NT4 and 2k and cannot be upgraded. > > > > Due to the MS067-08 vulnerability and non-release of a patch for NT4, we > > need to upgrade the server to Server 2003. I tried a straight "upgrade" > > and > > met with lots of failure, so in the end I am going for "clean slate". > > > > So far, I have wiped the hard drive and installed Server 2003 R2 and > > updated > > it. I have also run dcpromo. I selected the pre-windows 2000 computer > > option > > and I let dcpromo install a local DNS server, though it's not necessary. > > > > Now here are the catches: > > 1. I am a small cog at a big university. I do not have direct control over > > DNS servers. > > 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be > > joining > > this domain already have DNS names that are at the same level as the > > Domain > > Controller. > > > > I know this isn't a standard setup, which is why I'm here -- I've done > > Server 2003 and DNS stuff in the past, but not like this, haha. :) > > > > Here's the slightly obfuscated example: > > > > Server is Server 2003 R2 and "lab-server.university.edu" (yes the server > > has > > a hyphen in the name) > > Computer1 is Win2k and "computer1.university.edu" > > Computer2 is Win98 and "computer2.university.edu" > > etc. > > Domain is called "lab.university.edu"; netbios name is "lab". > > > > We have been able to set up an Alias record in DNS to make > > lab.university.edu the same as lab-server.university.edu. > > > > When I try to join the domain computer1, I get the "can't find the domain > > server; could be a DNS issue go.microsoft.com/fw=5171" -- something to > > that > > effect; 5171 is the right error message. > > > > What am I doing wrong? I really *only* need a NETBIOS domain, but that's > > not > > possible after WinNT Server, right? Do I need SRV and A records in DNS for > > this to work? What if I can't get those? > > > > Thanks in advance... I've been pulling my hair out for a couple of weeks > > now. I'm just too inexperienced to figure this one out. > > > > Best regards, > > J.R. Raith >
Show quote
Hide quote
"GJarvie756" wrote:
> I am not sure on how your your other servers are connecting to the new server > but you may need WINS Installed on your server on to resolve netbios names for Windows 98. or > if the servers at the univisity have it on then they will help resolving > netbios names. > > "Danny Sanders" wrote: > > > > 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be > > > joining > > > > Actually AD totally relies on DNS so it can function correctly. > > > > Basic DNS setup is Install DNS on the AD server and point the AD DNS server > > to itself in the properties of tcp/ip. Use the actual IP address not > > 127.0.0.1. Point ALL AD clients to the DNS server setup for the AD domain > > ONLY. For Internet acces set up forwarding and list (in your case) the > > University servers as the forwarders. This is the ONLY place on your AD > > domain where the University servers should be listed is as a forwarder. > > > > AD clients MUST find the DNS SRV records in order to "find" the domain. > > Pointiong the DNS server to itself for DNS allows the server to register the > > SRV record in it's DNAS zone. Pointing the clients to the DNS server setup > > for the AD domain will allow the AD clients to find the SRV record they need > > to "find" the domain. Remember servers are AD clients also. > > > > You are isolating your AD domain from the University domain. You will use > > your AD DNS server to "find" resources in your AD domain. You will use the > > University DNS server as a forwarder to find sites on the internet > > > > hth > > DDS > > > > > > > > "J.R. Raith" <JRRa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:4E10A573-DB46-452F-80A0-BB28F9DFD090@microsoft.com... > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > This is going to be extremely newbie-ish and probably long-winded. Sorry > > > for > > > both in advance. > > > > > > I have a server that used to be Server NT 4 running as a Domain Controller > > > *purely* to manage user access to some computers. These computers run > > > Win98, > > > NT4 and 2k and cannot be upgraded. > > > > > > Due to the MS067-08 vulnerability and non-release of a patch for NT4, we > > > need to upgrade the server to Server 2003. I tried a straight "upgrade" > > > and > > > met with lots of failure, so in the end I am going for "clean slate". > > > > > > So far, I have wiped the hard drive and installed Server 2003 R2 and > > > updated > > > it. I have also run dcpromo. I selected the pre-windows 2000 computer > > > option > > > and I let dcpromo install a local DNS server, though it's not necessary. > > > > > > Now here are the catches: > > > 1. I am a small cog at a big university. I do not have direct control over > > > DNS servers. > > > 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be > > > joining > > > this domain already have DNS names that are at the same level as the > > > Domain > > > Controller. > > > > > > I know this isn't a standard setup, which is why I'm here -- I've done > > > Server 2003 and DNS stuff in the past, but not like this, haha. :) > > > > > > Here's the slightly obfuscated example: > > > > > > Server is Server 2003 R2 and "lab-server.university.edu" (yes the server > > > has > > > a hyphen in the name) > > > Computer1 is Win2k and "computer1.university.edu" > > > Computer2 is Win98 and "computer2.university.edu" > > > etc. > > > Domain is called "lab.university.edu"; netbios name is "lab". > > > > > > We have been able to set up an Alias record in DNS to make > > > lab.university.edu the same as lab-server.university.edu. > > > > > > When I try to join the domain computer1, I get the "can't find the domain > > > server; could be a DNS issue go.microsoft.com/fw=5171" -- something to > > > that > > > effect; 5171 is the right error message. > > > > > > What am I doing wrong? I really *only* need a NETBIOS domain, but that's > > > not > > > possible after WinNT Server, right? Do I need SRV and A records in DNS for > > > this to work? What if I can't get those? > > > > > > Thanks in advance... I've been pulling my hair out for a couple of weeks > > > now. I'm just too inexperienced to figure this one out. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > J.R. Raith > > Hi Everyone,
Thanks for all of your help thus far and your suggestions. I really appreciate this. :) I understand the need for DNS. Got it. Still having trouble, though: lab-server.university.edu has its own IP address (not 127.0.0.1) as the only DNS Server entry under Network Connections -> Local Area Connection -> Properties -> TCP/IP. lab-server.university.edu has the two DNS server IP addresses that I know set up in the DNS server as forwarders. lab-server can ping any address (that is pingable) and surf the web no sweat. So DNS forwarding is working on lab-server. The DNS server was installed as part of the dcpromo process. The middle option was chosen ("Install a DNS server on this computer and use it for DNS queries" or something to that effect). In DNS, I see: LAB-SERVER -Forward Lookup Zones --_msdcs.lab.university.edu --lab.university.edu ---_msdcs -Reverse Lookup Zones -Event Viewer I don't see any SRV records, though... Am I wrong to expect that the dcpromo process should have done that? Could I have borked that in some way? (likely? :) heh). There is an A record under lab.university.edu pointing lab-server to its IP. There is also a NS and SOA record there, each showing lab-server.university.edu. computer1.university.edu has its IP address set and the DNS server is the IP address for lab-server.university.edu with no other DNS servers in its listing. computer1.university.edu cannot contact the domain lab.university.edu. Further, it does not appear to be resolving DNS correctly -- if I try to ping lab-server.university.edu, it returns "unknown host". But it can find it by NETBIOS, which I expect (since, of course, NETBIOS doesn't depend on DNS for resolution). I think this is all pointing to my DNS server being incorrectly set up, but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I took a class in Active Directory a few years back, but damn if I don't remember having this much trouble last time... haha. Thanks again for all of your help... Hopefully I can pick up as much knowledge as you guys some day. :) Regards, J.R. Danny Sanders wrote: Show quoteHide quote >> 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be >> joining > > Actually AD totally relies on DNS so it can function correctly. > > Basic DNS setup is Install DNS on the AD server and point the AD DNS > server to itself in the properties of tcp/ip. Use the actual IP address > not 127.0.0.1. Point ALL AD clients to the DNS server setup for the AD > domain ONLY. For Internet acces set up forwarding and list (in your > case) the University servers as the forwarders. This is the ONLY place > on your AD domain where the University servers should be listed is as a > forwarder. > > AD clients MUST find the DNS SRV records in order to "find" the domain. > Pointiong the DNS server to itself for DNS allows the server to register > the SRV record in it's DNAS zone. Pointing the clients to the DNS server > setup for the AD domain will allow the AD clients to find the SRV record > they need to "find" the domain. Remember servers are AD clients also. > > You are isolating your AD domain from the University domain. You will > use your AD DNS server to "find" resources in your AD domain. You will > use the University DNS server as a forwarder to find sites on the internet > > hth > DDS > > > > "J.R. Raith" <JRRa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:4E10A573-DB46-452F-80A0-BB28F9DFD090@microsoft.com... >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is going to be extremely newbie-ish and probably long-winded. >> Sorry for >> both in advance. >> >> I have a server that used to be Server NT 4 running as a Domain >> Controller >> *purely* to manage user access to some computers. These computers run >> Win98, >> NT4 and 2k and cannot be upgraded. >> >> Due to the MS067-08 vulnerability and non-release of a patch for NT4, we >> need to upgrade the server to Server 2003. I tried a straight >> "upgrade" and >> met with lots of failure, so in the end I am going for "clean slate". >> >> So far, I have wiped the hard drive and installed Server 2003 R2 and >> updated >> it. I have also run dcpromo. I selected the pre-windows 2000 computer >> option >> and I let dcpromo install a local DNS server, though it's not necessary. >> >> Now here are the catches: >> 1. I am a small cog at a big university. I do not have direct control >> over >> DNS servers. >> 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be >> joining >> this domain already have DNS names that are at the same level as the >> Domain >> Controller. >> >> I know this isn't a standard setup, which is why I'm here -- I've done >> Server 2003 and DNS stuff in the past, but not like this, haha. :) >> >> Here's the slightly obfuscated example: >> >> Server is Server 2003 R2 and "lab-server.university.edu" (yes the >> server has >> a hyphen in the name) >> Computer1 is Win2k and "computer1.university.edu" >> Computer2 is Win98 and "computer2.university.edu" >> etc. >> Domain is called "lab.university.edu"; netbios name is "lab". >> >> We have been able to set up an Alias record in DNS to make >> lab.university.edu the same as lab-server.university.edu. >> >> When I try to join the domain computer1, I get the "can't find the domain >> server; could be a DNS issue go.microsoft.com/fw=5171" -- something to >> that >> effect; 5171 is the right error message. >> >> What am I doing wrong? I really *only* need a NETBIOS domain, but >> that's not >> possible after WinNT Server, right? Do I need SRV and A records in DNS >> for >> this to work? What if I can't get those? >> >> Thanks in advance... I've been pulling my hair out for a couple of weeks >> now. I'm just too inexperienced to figure this one out. >> >> Best regards, >> J.R. Raith > In news:u5r6I0OqJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl, JR Raith <james.raith***@colorado.edu>, posted the following:Show quoteHide quote > Hi Everyone, As a refresher from your class, here are some basics behind AD:> > Thanks for all of your help thus far and your suggestions. I really > appreciate this. :) > > I understand the need for DNS. Got it. > > Still having trouble, though: > > lab-server.university.edu has its own IP address (not 127.0.0.1) as > the only DNS Server entry under Network Connections -> Local Area > Connection -> Properties -> TCP/IP. > > lab-server.university.edu has the two DNS server IP addresses that I > know set up in the DNS server as forwarders. lab-server can ping any > address (that is pingable) and surf the web no sweat. So DNS > forwarding is working on lab-server. > > The DNS server was installed as part of the dcpromo process. The > middle option was chosen ("Install a DNS server on this computer and > use it for DNS queries" or something to that effect). In DNS, I see: > LAB-SERVER > -Forward Lookup Zones > --_msdcs.lab.university.edu > --lab.university.edu > ---_msdcs > -Reverse Lookup Zones > -Event Viewer > > I don't see any SRV records, though... Am I wrong to expect that the > dcpromo process should have done that? Could I have borked that in > some way? (likely? :) heh). There is an A record under > lab.university.edu pointing lab-server to its IP. There is also a NS > and SOA record there, each showing lab-server.university.edu. > > computer1.university.edu has its IP address set and the DNS server is > the IP address for lab-server.university.edu with no other DNS servers > in its listing. computer1.university.edu cannot contact the domain > lab.university.edu. Further, it does not appear to be resolving DNS > correctly -- if I try to ping lab-server.university.edu, it returns > "unknown host". But it can find it by NETBIOS, which I expect (since, > of course, NETBIOS doesn't depend on DNS for resolution). > > I think this is all pointing to my DNS server being incorrectly set > up, but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I took a class in Active > Directory a few years back, but damn if I don't remember having this > much trouble last time... haha. > > Thanks again for all of your help... Hopefully I can pick up as much > knowledge as you guys some day. :) > Regards, > J.R. > As you've already aware of now, AD requires DNS. AD stores AD reource and service locations in DNS as SRV records. Hera are some more things to check as to why registration may not be working, which is why the SRV records are missing. This is a broad list, but they can all contribute to registration not working. 1) External DNS servers are configured under TCP/IP properties. Only use internal DNS servers when part of an Active Directory domain. AD Domain machines must ever be pointed at an external (ISP) DNS server or even use an ISP DNS server as an "Alternate DNS server". 2. Are any services disabled such as the DHCP Client service? (it's required). No DNS Name Resolution or DNS registration functions if DHCP Client Service Is Not Running http://support.microsoft.com/?id=268674 Dynamic DNS Updates Do Not Work if the DHCP Client Service Stops http://support.microsoft.com/?id=264539 3. AD/DNS zone not configured to allow dynamic updates. 4. Make sure 'Register this connection's address" in DNS is enabled under TCP/IP properties. 5. Missing or incorrect "Primary DNS suffix" or "Connection-specific DNS suffix" of the domain to which the machine belongs. With a missing/incorrect DNS suffix a machine cannot find the correct zone to register in. If missing or incorrect, it is called a Disjoined Domain Name. 6. Is the firewall service enabled? (disable it). 7. Were the default C: drive permissions altered and was a hotfix installed a recently? "Systems that have changed the default Access Control List permissions on the %windir%\registration directory may experience various problems after you install the Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-051 for COM+ and MS DTC" http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909444 For more info about this issue, see: http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2005/11/08/414002.aspx 8. If using Secure Updates: Not authenticated to the domain (which can be due to DNS misconfiguration or DNS server problem) 9. Is the File and Print services enabled? 10. Microsoft Client Services enabled? 11. Is DNS listening on the private LAN interface? 12. More than one NIC? 13. Updates allowed on the zone? 14. Primary DNS suffix matches the zone name in DNS and the AD domain name? 15. Was Zone Alarm ever installed on these machines? 16. Any Event log errors? 17. Was a Reg entry configured to stop registration? 246804 - How to Enable-Disable Windows 2000 Dynamic DNS Registrations (per NIC too): http://support.microsoft.com/?id=246804 18. Spyware or something else such as DotNetDns installed on it? 19. Single Label Domain Name? 20. Netlogon and DFS services are started. 21. Malware or virus altering network services preventing it from registering. 22. Some sort of firewall in place, whether the Windows firewall disabling File and Print Services, or a 3rd party firewall, which many AV programs now have built in and must be adjusted to allow this sort of traffic and exclude the NTDS and SYSVOL folders 291382 - Frequently asked questions about Windows 2000 DNS and Windows Server 2003 DNS http://support.microsoft.com/?id=291382 825036 - Best practices for DNS client settings in Windows 2000 Server and in Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/?id=825036 Do not configure the DNS client settings on the domain controllers to point to your Internet Service Provider's (ISP's) DNS servers or any other DNS other than the DNS hosting the AD zone http://smtp25.blogspot.com/2007/05/do-not-configure-dns-client-settings-on_818.html Common Mistakes When Upgrading a Windows 2000 Domain To a Windows 2003 Domain (whether it was upgraded or not, this is full of useful information relating to AD and DNS, among other info): http://support.microsoft.com/?id=555040 -- Ace This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights. Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSA Messaging, MCT Microsoft Certified Trainer ace***@mvps.RemoveThisPart.org For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers. Thanks for the helpful list -- I'll be checking it off shortly.
Before I even begin, though, am I to understand that DHCP is required? Our DHCP is hosted elsewhere and the IPs for the computers in the lab are set as Static. Thanks again, J.R. Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer] wrote: Show quoteHide quote > In news:u5r6I0OqJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl, > JR Raith <james.raith***@colorado.edu>, posted the following: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Thanks for all of your help thus far and your suggestions. I really >> appreciate this. :) >> >> I understand the need for DNS. Got it. >> >> Still having trouble, though: >> >> lab-server.university.edu has its own IP address (not 127.0.0.1) as >> the only DNS Server entry under Network Connections -> Local Area >> Connection -> Properties -> TCP/IP. >> >> lab-server.university.edu has the two DNS server IP addresses that I >> know set up in the DNS server as forwarders. lab-server can ping any >> address (that is pingable) and surf the web no sweat. So DNS >> forwarding is working on lab-server. >> >> The DNS server was installed as part of the dcpromo process. The >> middle option was chosen ("Install a DNS server on this computer and >> use it for DNS queries" or something to that effect). In DNS, I see: >> LAB-SERVER >> -Forward Lookup Zones >> --_msdcs.lab.university.edu >> --lab.university.edu >> ---_msdcs >> -Reverse Lookup Zones >> -Event Viewer >> >> I don't see any SRV records, though... Am I wrong to expect that the >> dcpromo process should have done that? Could I have borked that in >> some way? (likely? :) heh). There is an A record under >> lab.university.edu pointing lab-server to its IP. There is also a NS >> and SOA record there, each showing lab-server.university.edu. >> >> computer1.university.edu has its IP address set and the DNS server is >> the IP address for lab-server.university.edu with no other DNS servers >> in its listing. computer1.university.edu cannot contact the domain >> lab.university.edu. Further, it does not appear to be resolving DNS >> correctly -- if I try to ping lab-server.university.edu, it returns >> "unknown host". But it can find it by NETBIOS, which I expect (since, >> of course, NETBIOS doesn't depend on DNS for resolution). >> >> I think this is all pointing to my DNS server being incorrectly set >> up, but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I took a class in Active >> Directory a few years back, but damn if I don't remember having this >> much trouble last time... haha. >> >> Thanks again for all of your help... Hopefully I can pick up as much >> knowledge as you guys some day. :) >> Regards, >> J.R. >> > > As a refresher from your class, here are some basics behind AD: > > As you've already aware of now, AD requires DNS. AD stores AD reource > and service locations in DNS as SRV records. Hera are some more things > to check as to why registration may not be working, which is why the SRV > records are missing. This is a broad list, but they can all contribute > to registration not working. > > 1) External DNS servers are configured under TCP/IP properties. Only > use internal DNS servers when part of an Active > > Directory domain. AD Domain machines must ever be pointed at an > external (ISP) DNS server or even use an ISP DNS > > server as an "Alternate DNS server". > > 2. Are any services disabled such as the DHCP Client service? (it's > required). > > No DNS Name Resolution or DNS registration functions if DHCP Client > Service Is Not Running > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=268674 > > Dynamic DNS Updates Do Not Work if the DHCP Client Service Stops > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=264539 > > 3. AD/DNS zone not configured to allow dynamic updates. > > 4. Make sure 'Register this connection's address" in DNS is enabled > under TCP/IP properties. > > 5. Missing or incorrect "Primary DNS suffix" or "Connection-specific DNS > suffix" of the domain to which the machine > > belongs. With a missing/incorrect DNS suffix a machine cannot find the > correct zone to register in. If missing or > > incorrect, it is called a Disjoined Domain Name. > > 6. Is the firewall service enabled? (disable it). > > 7. Were the default C: drive permissions altered and was a hotfix > installed a recently? > > "Systems that have changed the default Access Control List permissions > on the > %windir%\registration directory may experience various problems after you > install the Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-051 for COM+ and MS DTC" > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909444 > > For more info about this issue, see: > http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2005/11/08/414002.aspx > > 8. If using Secure Updates: Not authenticated to the domain (which can > be due to DNS misconfiguration or DNS server > > problem) > > 9. Is the File and Print services enabled? > > 10. Microsoft Client Services enabled? > > 11. Is DNS listening on the private LAN interface? > > 12. More than one NIC? > > 13. Updates allowed on the zone? > > 14. Primary DNS suffix matches the zone name in DNS and the AD domain name? > > 15. Was Zone Alarm ever installed on these machines? > > 16. Any Event log errors? > > 17. Was a Reg entry configured to stop registration? > 246804 - How to Enable-Disable Windows 2000 Dynamic DNS Registrations > (per NIC too): > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=246804 > > 18. Spyware or something else such as DotNetDns installed on it? > > 19. Single Label Domain Name? > > 20. Netlogon and DFS services are started. > > 21. Malware or virus altering network services preventing it from > registering. > > 22. Some sort of firewall in place, whether the Windows firewall > disabling File and Print Services, or a 3rd party > > firewall, which many AV programs now have built in and must be adjusted > to allow this sort of traffic and exclude the > > NTDS and SYSVOL folders > > > > > 291382 - Frequently asked questions about Windows 2000 DNS and Windows > Server 2003 DNS > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=291382 > > 825036 - Best practices for DNS client settings in Windows 2000 Server > and in Windows Server 2003 > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=825036 > > Do not configure the DNS client settings on the domain controllers to > point to your Internet Service Provider's (ISP's) DNS servers or any > other DNS other than the DNS hosting the AD zone > http://smtp25.blogspot.com/2007/05/do-not-configure-dns-client-settings-on_818.html > > > Common Mistakes When Upgrading a Windows 2000 Domain To a Windows 2003 > Domain (whether it was upgraded or not, this is full of useful > information relating to AD and DNS, among other info): > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=555040 > > In news:u3Jml5WqJHA.4564@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, JR Raith <james.raith***@colorado.edu>, posted the following:> Thanks for the helpful list -- I'll be checking it off shortly. No, but the DHCP CLient Service is REQUIRED, whether a machine is static IPs > > Before I even begin, though, am I to understand that DHCP is required? > Our DHCP is hosted elsewhere and the IPs for the computers in the lab > are set as Static. > or not. This service does the actual registration and resolving. Kind of a misnomer. I provided two links concerning this service in my previous post at the top of the list. You may have missed them. I am reposting them for you here, for your convenience: No DNS Name Resolution or DNS registration functions if DHCP Client Service Is Not Running http://support.microsoft.com/?id=268674 Dynamic DNS Updates Do Not Work if the DHCP Client Service Stops http://support.microsoft.com/?id=264539 Ace Ah, thanks Ace. :D
*goes to read* J.R. Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer] wrote: Show quoteHide quote > In news:u3Jml5WqJHA.4564@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, > JR Raith <james.raith***@colorado.edu>, posted the following: >> Thanks for the helpful list -- I'll be checking it off shortly. >> >> Before I even begin, though, am I to understand that DHCP is required? >> Our DHCP is hosted elsewhere and the IPs for the computers in the lab >> are set as Static. >> > > No, but the DHCP CLient Service is REQUIRED, whether a machine is static > IPs or not. This service does the actual registration and resolving. > Kind of a misnomer. I provided two links concerning this service in my > previous post at the top of the list. You may have missed them. I am > reposting them for you here, for your convenience: > > No DNS Name Resolution or DNS registration functions if DHCP Client > Service Is Not Running > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=268674 > > Dynamic DNS Updates Do Not Work if the DHCP Client Service Stops > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=264539 > > > Ace > In news:%23ednjQXqJHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl, JR Raith <james.raith***@colorado.edu>, posted the following:> Ah, thanks Ace. :D That reminds me of the old saying, RTFM... Read the Full Manual!! :-)> *goes to read* > > J.R. Anyway, let me know how you make out. Ace > I don't see any SRV records, though... Am I wrong to expect that the The SRV records are registered during the netlogon process. If you can't > dcpromo process should have done that? Could I have borked that in some restart the server run net stop netlogon followed by net start netlogon and check for the SRV records. See: How to verify that SRV DNS records have been created for a domain controller http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816587 How To Reregister SRV records of a Domain Controller In DNS Zone http://support.microsoft.com/kb/556002 hth DDS Show quoteHide quote "JR Raith" <james.raith***@colorado.edu> wrote in message news:u5r6I0OqJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Hi Everyone, > > Thanks for all of your help thus far and your suggestions. I really > appreciate this. :) > > I understand the need for DNS. Got it. > > Still having trouble, though: > > lab-server.university.edu has its own IP address (not 127.0.0.1) as the > only DNS Server entry under Network Connections -> Local Area > Connection -> Properties -> TCP/IP. > > lab-server.university.edu has the two DNS server IP addresses that I know > set up in the DNS server as forwarders. lab-server can ping any address > (that is pingable) and surf the web no sweat. So DNS forwarding is working > on lab-server. > > The DNS server was installed as part of the dcpromo process. The middle > option was chosen ("Install a DNS server on this computer and use it for > DNS queries" or something to that effect). In DNS, I see: > LAB-SERVER > -Forward Lookup Zones > --_msdcs.lab.university.edu > --lab.university.edu > ---_msdcs > -Reverse Lookup Zones > -Event Viewer > > I don't see any SRV records, though... Am I wrong to expect that the > dcpromo process should have done that? Could I have borked that in some > way? (likely? :) heh). There is an A record under lab.university.edu > pointing lab-server to its IP. There is also a NS and SOA record there, > each showing lab-server.university.edu. > > computer1.university.edu has its IP address set and the DNS server is the > IP address for lab-server.university.edu with no other DNS servers in its > listing. computer1.university.edu cannot contact the domain > lab.university.edu. Further, it does not appear to be resolving DNS > correctly -- if I try to ping lab-server.university.edu, it returns > "unknown host". But it can find it by NETBIOS, which I expect (since, of > course, NETBIOS doesn't depend on DNS for resolution). > > I think this is all pointing to my DNS server being incorrectly set up, > but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I took a class in Active Directory > a few years back, but damn if I don't remember having this much trouble > last time... haha. > > Thanks again for all of your help... Hopefully I can pick up as much > knowledge as you guys some day. :) > Regards, > J.R. > > > > Danny Sanders wrote: >>> 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be >>> joining >> >> Actually AD totally relies on DNS so it can function correctly. >> >> Basic DNS setup is Install DNS on the AD server and point the AD DNS >> server to itself in the properties of tcp/ip. Use the actual IP address >> not 127.0.0.1. Point ALL AD clients to the DNS server setup for the AD >> domain ONLY. For Internet acces set up forwarding and list (in your case) >> the University servers as the forwarders. This is the ONLY place on your >> AD domain where the University servers should be listed is as a >> forwarder. >> >> AD clients MUST find the DNS SRV records in order to "find" the domain. >> Pointiong the DNS server to itself for DNS allows the server to register >> the SRV record in it's DNAS zone. Pointing the clients to the DNS server >> setup for the AD domain will allow the AD clients to find the SRV record >> they need to "find" the domain. Remember servers are AD clients also. >> >> You are isolating your AD domain from the University domain. You will use >> your AD DNS server to "find" resources in your AD domain. You will use >> the University DNS server as a forwarder to find sites on the internet >> >> hth >> DDS >> >> >> >> "J.R. Raith" <JRRa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:4E10A573-DB46-452F-80A0-BB28F9DFD090@microsoft.com... >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> This is going to be extremely newbie-ish and probably long-winded. Sorry >>> for >>> both in advance. >>> >>> I have a server that used to be Server NT 4 running as a Domain >>> Controller >>> *purely* to manage user access to some computers. These computers run >>> Win98, >>> NT4 and 2k and cannot be upgraded. >>> >>> Due to the MS067-08 vulnerability and non-release of a patch for NT4, we >>> need to upgrade the server to Server 2003. I tried a straight "upgrade" >>> and >>> met with lots of failure, so in the end I am going for "clean slate". >>> >>> So far, I have wiped the hard drive and installed Server 2003 R2 and >>> updated >>> it. I have also run dcpromo. I selected the pre-windows 2000 computer >>> option >>> and I let dcpromo install a local DNS server, though it's not necessary. >>> >>> Now here are the catches: >>> 1. I am a small cog at a big university. I do not have direct control >>> over >>> DNS servers. >>> 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be >>> joining >>> this domain already have DNS names that are at the same level as the >>> Domain >>> Controller. >>> >>> I know this isn't a standard setup, which is why I'm here -- I've done >>> Server 2003 and DNS stuff in the past, but not like this, haha. :) >>> >>> Here's the slightly obfuscated example: >>> >>> Server is Server 2003 R2 and "lab-server.university.edu" (yes the server >>> has >>> a hyphen in the name) >>> Computer1 is Win2k and "computer1.university.edu" >>> Computer2 is Win98 and "computer2.university.edu" >>> etc. >>> Domain is called "lab.university.edu"; netbios name is "lab". >>> >>> We have been able to set up an Alias record in DNS to make >>> lab.university.edu the same as lab-server.university.edu. >>> >>> When I try to join the domain computer1, I get the "can't find the >>> domain >>> server; could be a DNS issue go.microsoft.com/fw=5171" -- something to >>> that >>> effect; 5171 is the right error message. >>> >>> What am I doing wrong? I really *only* need a NETBIOS domain, but that's >>> not >>> possible after WinNT Server, right? Do I need SRV and A records in DNS >>> for >>> this to work? What if I can't get those? >>> >>> Thanks in advance... I've been pulling my hair out for a couple of weeks >>> now. I'm just too inexperienced to figure this one out. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> J.R. Raith >> Hi Danny,
Thanks for the tip -- I think this (or something relating to it) was the main roadblock. I came back to the server after being away from it for 12 hours or so (sometimes you just need to step back and get some caffeine, heh) and lo-and-behold, there were all of the SRV records. On top of that. DNS started resolving from the client computer. I disabled the Windows firewall on lab-server.university.edu... but shouldn't I be able to leave this running for security and whatnot? I think I'll step away from problem computers more often, heh. Thanks, J.R. Danny Sanders wrote: Show quoteHide quote >> I don't see any SRV records, though... Am I wrong to expect that the >> dcpromo process should have done that? Could I have borked that in some > > > The SRV records are registered during the netlogon process. If you can't > restart the server run net stop netlogon followed by net start netlogon > and check for the SRV records. > > See: > How to verify that SRV DNS records have been created for a domain > controller > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816587 > How To Reregister SRV records of a Domain Controller In DNS Zone > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/556002 > > > hth > DDS > > "JR Raith" <james.raith***@colorado.edu> wrote in message > news:u5r6I0OqJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Thanks for all of your help thus far and your suggestions. I really >> appreciate this. :) >> >> I understand the need for DNS. Got it. >> >> Still having trouble, though: >> >> lab-server.university.edu has its own IP address (not 127.0.0.1) as >> the only DNS Server entry under Network Connections -> Local Area >> Connection -> Properties -> TCP/IP. >> >> lab-server.university.edu has the two DNS server IP addresses that I >> know set up in the DNS server as forwarders. lab-server can ping any >> address (that is pingable) and surf the web no sweat. So DNS >> forwarding is working on lab-server. >> >> The DNS server was installed as part of the dcpromo process. The >> middle option was chosen ("Install a DNS server on this computer and >> use it for DNS queries" or something to that effect). In DNS, I see: >> LAB-SERVER >> -Forward Lookup Zones >> --_msdcs.lab.university.edu >> --lab.university.edu >> ---_msdcs >> -Reverse Lookup Zones >> -Event Viewer >> >> I don't see any SRV records, though... Am I wrong to expect that the >> dcpromo process should have done that? Could I have borked that in >> some way? (likely? :) heh). There is an A record under >> lab.university.edu pointing lab-server to its IP. There is also a NS >> and SOA record there, each showing lab-server.university.edu. >> >> computer1.university.edu has its IP address set and the DNS server is >> the IP address for lab-server.university.edu with no other DNS servers >> in its listing. computer1.university.edu cannot contact the domain >> lab.university.edu. Further, it does not appear to be resolving DNS >> correctly -- if I try to ping lab-server.university.edu, it returns >> "unknown host". But it can find it by NETBIOS, which I expect (since, >> of course, NETBIOS doesn't depend on DNS for resolution). >> >> I think this is all pointing to my DNS server being incorrectly set >> up, but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I took a class in Active >> Directory a few years back, but damn if I don't remember having this >> much trouble last time... haha. >> >> Thanks again for all of your help... Hopefully I can pick up as much >> knowledge as you guys some day. :) >> Regards, >> J.R. >> >> >> >> Danny Sanders wrote: >>>> 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be >>>> joining >>> >>> Actually AD totally relies on DNS so it can function correctly. >>> >>> Basic DNS setup is Install DNS on the AD server and point the AD DNS >>> server to itself in the properties of tcp/ip. Use the actual IP >>> address not 127.0.0.1. Point ALL AD clients to the DNS server setup >>> for the AD domain ONLY. For Internet acces set up forwarding and list >>> (in your case) the University servers as the forwarders. This is the >>> ONLY place on your AD domain where the University servers should be >>> listed is as a forwarder. >>> >>> AD clients MUST find the DNS SRV records in order to "find" the >>> domain. Pointiong the DNS server to itself for DNS allows the server >>> to register the SRV record in it's DNAS zone. Pointing the clients to >>> the DNS server setup for the AD domain will allow the AD clients to >>> find the SRV record they need to "find" the domain. Remember servers >>> are AD clients also. >>> >>> You are isolating your AD domain from the University domain. You will >>> use your AD DNS server to "find" resources in your AD domain. You >>> will use the University DNS server as a forwarder to find sites on >>> the internet >>> >>> hth >>> DDS >>> >>> >>> >>> "J.R. Raith" <JRRa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >>> news:4E10A573-DB46-452F-80A0-BB28F9DFD090@microsoft.com... >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> This is going to be extremely newbie-ish and probably long-winded. >>>> Sorry for >>>> both in advance. >>>> >>>> I have a server that used to be Server NT 4 running as a Domain >>>> Controller >>>> *purely* to manage user access to some computers. These computers >>>> run Win98, >>>> NT4 and 2k and cannot be upgraded. >>>> >>>> Due to the MS067-08 vulnerability and non-release of a patch for >>>> NT4, we >>>> need to upgrade the server to Server 2003. I tried a straight >>>> "upgrade" and >>>> met with lots of failure, so in the end I am going for "clean slate". >>>> >>>> So far, I have wiped the hard drive and installed Server 2003 R2 and >>>> updated >>>> it. I have also run dcpromo. I selected the pre-windows 2000 >>>> computer option >>>> and I let dcpromo install a local DNS server, though it's not >>>> necessary. >>>> >>>> Now here are the catches: >>>> 1. I am a small cog at a big university. I do not have direct >>>> control over >>>> DNS servers. >>>> 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be >>>> joining >>>> this domain already have DNS names that are at the same level as the >>>> Domain >>>> Controller. >>>> >>>> I know this isn't a standard setup, which is why I'm here -- I've done >>>> Server 2003 and DNS stuff in the past, but not like this, haha. :) >>>> >>>> Here's the slightly obfuscated example: >>>> >>>> Server is Server 2003 R2 and "lab-server.university.edu" (yes the >>>> server has >>>> a hyphen in the name) >>>> Computer1 is Win2k and "computer1.university.edu" >>>> Computer2 is Win98 and "computer2.university.edu" >>>> etc. >>>> Domain is called "lab.university.edu"; netbios name is "lab". >>>> >>>> We have been able to set up an Alias record in DNS to make >>>> lab.university.edu the same as lab-server.university.edu. >>>> >>>> When I try to join the domain computer1, I get the "can't find the >>>> domain >>>> server; could be a DNS issue go.microsoft.com/fw=5171" -- something >>>> to that >>>> effect; 5171 is the right error message. >>>> >>>> What am I doing wrong? I really *only* need a NETBIOS domain, but >>>> that's not >>>> possible after WinNT Server, right? Do I need SRV and A records in >>>> DNS for >>>> this to work? What if I can't get those? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance... I've been pulling my hair out for a couple of >>>> weeks >>>> now. I'm just too inexperienced to figure this one out. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> J.R. Raith >>> > Hello J.R. Raith,
AD relies complete on DNS, so you MUST have a DNS server for the domain you have created. The clients have to use the 2003 R2 DNS server as preferred DNS on the NIC if you like to join it to the domain. No other DNS servers should be added there, clients will have conflict's with the domain you have setup. Additional on the pre-windows 2000 machines install this one: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/288358 Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm Show quoteHide quote > Hi everyone, > > This is going to be extremely newbie-ish and probably long-winded. > Sorry for both in advance. > > I have a server that used to be Server NT 4 running as a Domain > Controller *purely* to manage user access to some computers. These > computers run Win98, NT4 and 2k and cannot be upgraded. > > Due to the MS067-08 vulnerability and non-release of a patch for NT4, > we need to upgrade the server to Server 2003. I tried a straight > "upgrade" and met with lots of failure, so in the end I am going for > "clean slate". > > So far, I have wiped the hard drive and installed Server 2003 R2 and > updated it. I have also run dcpromo. I selected the pre-windows 2000 > computer option and I let dcpromo install a local DNS server, though > it's not necessary. > > Now here are the catches: > 1. I am a small cog at a big university. I do not have direct control > over > DNS servers. > 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be > joining > this domain already have DNS names that are at the same level as the > Domain > Controller. > I know this isn't a standard setup, which is why I'm here -- I've done > Server 2003 and DNS stuff in the past, but not like this, haha. :) > > Here's the slightly obfuscated example: > > Server is Server 2003 R2 and "lab-server.university.edu" (yes the > server has > a hyphen in the name) > Computer1 is Win2k and "computer1.university.edu" > Computer2 is Win98 and "computer2.university.edu" > etc. > Domain is called "lab.university.edu"; netbios name is "lab". > We have been able to set up an Alias record in DNS to make > lab.university.edu the same as lab-server.university.edu. > > When I try to join the domain computer1, I get the "can't find the > domain server; could be a DNS issue go.microsoft.com/fw=5171" -- > something to that effect; 5171 is the right error message. > > What am I doing wrong? I really *only* need a NETBIOS domain, but > that's not possible after WinNT Server, right? Do I need SRV and A > records in DNS for this to work? What if I can't get those? > > Thanks in advance... I've been pulling my hair out for a couple of > weeks now. I'm just too inexperienced to figure this one out. > > Best regards, > J.R. Raith Unfortunately you machines will need dns. You can make it so the dc is a
dns server as well but the clients need to point to this server for dns services. If you can point the clients at your dc for dns services, then take this dc/dns server and forward all unknown dns requests to the root dns server with in your campus. I could go into more details but not sure if you are interested. Give the info above some thought and/or research and if you have more questions post back and I (Or someone else I'm sure) can go into more details. Don't feel afraid to ask questions, that is what the NewsGroups are for, to assist others. I still post quite often and people have always been very polite and helpful. -- Show quoteHide quotePaul Bergson MVP - Directory Services MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, BS CSci 2008, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4 http://www.pbbergs.com Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "J.R. Raith" <JRRa***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4E10A573-DB46-452F-80A0-BB28F9DFD090@microsoft.com... > Hi everyone, > > This is going to be extremely newbie-ish and probably long-winded. Sorry > for > both in advance. > > I have a server that used to be Server NT 4 running as a Domain Controller > *purely* to manage user access to some computers. These computers run > Win98, > NT4 and 2k and cannot be upgraded. > > Due to the MS067-08 vulnerability and non-release of a patch for NT4, we > need to upgrade the server to Server 2003. I tried a straight "upgrade" > and > met with lots of failure, so in the end I am going for "clean slate". > > So far, I have wiped the hard drive and installed Server 2003 R2 and > updated > it. I have also run dcpromo. I selected the pre-windows 2000 computer > option > and I let dcpromo install a local DNS server, though it's not necessary. > > Now here are the catches: > 1. I am a small cog at a big university. I do not have direct control over > DNS servers. > 2. We don't *need* DNS resolution. All of the computers that will be > joining > this domain already have DNS names that are at the same level as the > Domain > Controller. > > I know this isn't a standard setup, which is why I'm here -- I've done > Server 2003 and DNS stuff in the past, but not like this, haha. :) > > Here's the slightly obfuscated example: > > Server is Server 2003 R2 and "lab-server.university.edu" (yes the server > has > a hyphen in the name) > Computer1 is Win2k and "computer1.university.edu" > Computer2 is Win98 and "computer2.university.edu" > etc. > Domain is called "lab.university.edu"; netbios name is "lab". > > We have been able to set up an Alias record in DNS to make > lab.university.edu the same as lab-server.university.edu. > > When I try to join the domain computer1, I get the "can't find the domain > server; could be a DNS issue go.microsoft.com/fw=5171" -- something to > that > effect; 5171 is the right error message. > > What am I doing wrong? I really *only* need a NETBIOS domain, but that's > not > possible after WinNT Server, right? Do I need SRV and A records in DNS for > this to work? What if I can't get those? > > Thanks in advance... I've been pulling my hair out for a couple of weeks > now. I'm just too inexperienced to figure this one out. > > Best regards, > J.R. Raith |
|||||||||||||||||||||||