|
server
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
seemingly simple question: Customized Signature in MS Outlook 2007We have a client (SBS2003 / MS Office 2007 running on Windows XP SP3 machines) who has a request that we provide a customized signature that pulls specific information from AD (First Name, Last Name, Company, Address, Title, image) so that everyone in the office will have essentially the same signature in e-mail. Essentially, that signature would look something like this Cary Shultz MyWidgets, Inc. 123 Main Street Anytown, VA 24000 Tel: 540.555.1212 insert company .jpeg here This is becoming a bit more challenging than I thought it might be. Does anyone know of a way to accomplish this? We would like to avoid purchasing a third-party application if possible (but, can anyone recommend one - just in case?). I have included several news groups (SBS, AD, GPO, Exchange) in this same post..... Thanks everyone! > We would like to avoid purchasing a third-party application if possible
www.exclaimer.co.uk
> (but, can anyone recommend one - just in case?). It does what you want, re: insert AD information for users on disclaimers/signatures Oliver That's what we use.
Show quoteHide quote "Oliver Moazzezi [MVP]" <o.moazzezino@spamfreenet.co.uk> wrote in message news:eDqph0ipJHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> We would like to avoid purchasing a third-party application if possible >> (but, can anyone recommend one - just in case?). > > www.exclaimer.co.uk > > It does what you want, re: insert AD information for users on > disclaimers/signatures > > Oliver > Hi,
Martin Blackstone [MVP] schrieb: >> www.exclaimer.co.uk What about crypted Emails?>> It does what you want, re: insert AD information for users on >> disclaimers/signatures Excalimer sits on the SMTP and manipulates every outgoing mail (or every defined by filter/rule). If it´s put his signatur on a crypted mail, the fingerprint is no longer valid, the mail is manipulated. If I exclude crypted mails by rule, then they will not have a signature. Not what I want ... Mark -- Mark Heitbrink - MVP Windows Server - Group Policy Homepage: www.gruppenrichtlinien.de - deutsch Discuss : www.freelists.org/list/gpupdate
Show quote
Hide quote
"Mark Heitbrink [MVP]" <spam-only@gruppenrichtlinien.de> wrote in message Good points. However I think that's a question better asked of the Vendor.news:uI4EZljpJHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Hi, > > Martin Blackstone [MVP] schrieb: >>> www.exclaimer.co.uk >>> It does what you want, re: insert AD information for users on >>> disclaimers/signatures > > What about crypted Emails? > Excalimer sits on the SMTP and manipulates every outgoing mail > (or every defined by filter/rule). > If it´s put his signatur on a crypted mail, the fingerprint is > no longer valid, the mail is manipulated. > > If I exclude crypted mails by rule, then they will not have a > signature. Not what I want ... > Oliver, Marking, Mark!
exclaimer was what I was thinking but the client does send a lot of 'encryted' e-mails to the US Government (specific 'Departments'). So, that kinda killed that idea.....But, shoot! Thanks for the awesome tip. If it were not for that one 'tiny' issue this would have been the perfect answer (sorry for not including that in my original post....that would have been useful information for me to include!). Cary Show quoteHide quote "Mark Heitbrink [MVP]" <spam-only@gruppenrichtlinien.de> wrote in message news:uI4EZljpJHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Hi, > > Martin Blackstone [MVP] schrieb: >>> www.exclaimer.co.uk >>> It does what you want, re: insert AD information for users on >>> disclaimers/signatures > > What about crypted Emails? > Excalimer sits on the SMTP and manipulates every outgoing mail > (or every defined by filter/rule). > If it´s put his signatur on a crypted mail, the fingerprint is > no longer valid, the mail is manipulated. > > If I exclude crypted mails by rule, then they will not have a > signature. Not what I want ... > > Mark > -- > Mark Heitbrink - MVP Windows Server - Group Policy > > Homepage: www.gruppenrichtlinien.de - deutsch > Discuss : www.freelists.org/list/gpupdate Hello Cary,
Check this .vbs: http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=1079 Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm Show quoteHide quote > Good morning, All! > > We have a client (SBS2003 / MS Office 2007 running on Windows XP SP3 > machines) who has a request that we provide a customized signature > that pulls specific information from AD (First Name, Last Name, > Company, Address, Title, image) so that everyone in the office will > have essentially the same signature in e-mail. > > Essentially, that signature would look something like this > > Cary Shultz > MyWidgets, Inc. > 123 Main Street > Anytown, VA 24000 > Tel: 540.555.1212 > insert company .jpeg here > This is becoming a bit more challenging than I thought it might be. > > Does anyone know of a way to accomplish this? > > We would like to avoid purchasing a third-party application if > possible (but, can anyone recommend one - just in case?). > > I have included several news groups (SBS, AD, GPO, Exchange) in this > same post..... > > Thanks everyone! > Das scheint, mir geholfen zu haben!
I wonder how I did not find it? I did look before posting!!!!!!!!!!!! And, I looked on this web site (known about this site for several years!). Oh, well. Maybe I needed to take my glasses off! Thanks! Show quoteHide quote "Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message news:ff16fb661d0698cb744ead16fc69@msnews.microsoft.com... > Hello Cary, > > Check this .vbs: > http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=1079 > > Best regards > > Meinolf Weber > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > confers no rights. > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >> Good morning, All! >> >> We have a client (SBS2003 / MS Office 2007 running on Windows XP SP3 >> machines) who has a request that we provide a customized signature >> that pulls specific information from AD (First Name, Last Name, >> Company, Address, Title, image) so that everyone in the office will >> have essentially the same signature in e-mail. >> >> Essentially, that signature would look something like this >> >> Cary Shultz >> MyWidgets, Inc. >> 123 Main Street >> Anytown, VA 24000 >> Tel: 540.555.1212 >> insert company .jpeg here >> This is becoming a bit more challenging than I thought it might be. >> >> Does anyone know of a way to accomplish this? >> >> We would like to avoid purchasing a third-party application if >> possible (but, can anyone recommend one - just in case?). >> >> I have included several news groups (SBS, AD, GPO, Exchange) in this >> same post..... >> >> Thanks everyone! >> > > Hello Cary,
Freut mich, nice to hear and help. Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm Show quoteHide quote > Das scheint, mir geholfen zu haben! > > I wonder how I did not find it? I did look before posting!!!!!!!!!!!! > And, I looked on this web site (known about this site for several > years!). Oh, well. Maybe I needed to take my glasses off! > > Thanks! > > "Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message > news:ff16fb661d0698cb744ead16fc69@msnews.microsoft.com... > >> Hello Cary, >> >> Check this .vbs: >> http://cwashington.netreach.net/depo/view.asp?Index=1079 >> Best regards >> >> Meinolf Weber >> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and >> confers no rights. >> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >>> Good morning, All! >>> >>> We have a client (SBS2003 / MS Office 2007 running on Windows XP SP3 >>> machines) who has a request that we provide a customized signature >>> that pulls specific information from AD (First Name, Last Name, >>> Company, Address, Title, image) so that everyone in the office will >>> have essentially the same signature in e-mail. >>> >>> Essentially, that signature would look something like this >>> >>> Cary Shultz >>> MyWidgets, Inc. >>> 123 Main Street >>> Anytown, VA 24000 >>> Tel: 540.555.1212 >>> insert company .jpeg here >>> This is becoming a bit more challenging than I thought it might be. >>> Does anyone know of a way to accomplish this? >>> >>> We would like to avoid purchasing a third-party application if >>> possible (but, can anyone recommend one - just in case?). >>> >>> I have included several news groups (SBS, AD, GPO, Exchange) in this >>> same post..... >>> >>> Thanks everyone! >>> In news:ff16fb661d0998cb746079d097a9@msnews.microsoft.com, Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS] <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de>, posted the following:> Hello Cary, Will that work with encrypted emails? One client I worked with used IronMail > > Freut mich, nice to hear and help. > > Best regards > including for TLS, but it did not pull AD info out for sigs. -- Ace This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights. Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSA Messaging, MCT Microsoft Certified Trainer ace***@mvps.RemoveThisPart.org For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers. Ace,
I am going to test this.....I have only briefly looked at the web site that Meinolf suggested. I will let everyone know as - I am sure - we are not the only one sending e-mail to a Governmental Department. I will keep you posted! BTW - love the "Red Marbles" e-mail......... Show quoteHide quote "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]" <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23gX9UKkpJHA.500@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > In news:ff16fb661d0998cb746079d097a9@msnews.microsoft.com, > Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS] <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de>, posted the following: >> Hello Cary, >> >> Freut mich, nice to hear and help. >> >> Best regards >> > > Will that work with encrypted emails? One client I worked with used > IronMail including for TLS, but it did not pull AD info out for sigs. > > -- > Ace > > This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and > confers no rights. > > Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSA Messaging, MCT > Microsoft Certified Trainer > ace***@mvps.RemoveThisPart.org > > For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please > check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers. > > > In news:OdUQXZkpJHA.5280@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, Cary Shultz <cshu***@outsourceit.com>, posted the following:> Ace, Red marbles? LOL! That was an interesting issue. :-)> > I am going to test this.....I have only briefly looked at the web > site that Meinolf suggested. I will let everyone know as - I am sure > - we are not the only one sending e-mail to a Governmental Department. > > I will keep you posted! > > BTW - love the "Red Marbles" e-mail......... As for Ironmail, I was working at a pharma with the same criteria regarding sending encrypted emails to the FDA. Looking forward to what you find out. Ace On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:20:18 -0400, "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified
Trainer]" <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com> wrote: >In news:ff16fb661d0998cb746079d097a9@msnews.microsoft.com, It will if it's the one I think it is. Outlook encrypts the email and>Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS] <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de>, posted the following: >> Hello Cary, >> >> Freut mich, nice to hear and help. >> >> Best regards >> > >Will that work with encrypted emails? One client I worked with used IronMail >including for TLS, but it did not pull AD info out for sigs. Outlook inserts the signature. The signature is just some additional text within the message body and it's encrypted, too. --- Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
Show quote
Hide quote
"Rich Matheisen [MVP]" <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM> wrote in message Hi Rich,news:adutr45m67qhcs19pc8bqq0apiia8265on@4ax.com... > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:20:18 -0400, "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified > Trainer]" <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>In news:ff16fb661d0998cb746079d097a9@msnews.microsoft.com, >>Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS] <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de>, posted the following: >>> Hello Cary, >>> >>> Freut mich, nice to hear and help. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >> >>Will that work with encrypted emails? One client I worked with used >>IronMail >>including for TLS, but it did not pull AD info out for sigs. > > It will if it's the one I think it is. Outlook encrypts the email and > Outlook inserts the signature. The signature is just some additional > text within the message body and it's encrypted, too. > --- > Rich Matheisen > MCSE+I, Exchange MVP IronMail from CA. It does parse AD pretty much only to prevent DHA and to reject emails not in the directory, but wasn't sure if it will populate specific AD user attributs, as indicated in this thread. The one thing I see, is since Outlook encrypts the email, IronMail cannot open it to attach such a sig, unless it appends it to the encrypted body. So are you saying that is what it would do? I would have tested it at the customer site, but unfortunately I'm no longer with that customer. Thanks, Ace On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:29:49 -0400, "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified
Trainer]" <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com> wrote: [ snip ] Show quoteHide quote >>>Will that work with encrypted emails? One client I worked with used Been using Ironmail for years (I think we started with release 4.0 -->>>IronMail >>>including for TLS, but it did not pull AD info out for sigs. >> >> It will if it's the one I think it is. Outlook encrypts the email and >> Outlook inserts the signature. The signature is just some additional >> text within the message body and it's encrypted, too. >> --- >> Rich Matheisen >> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP > > >Hi Rich, > >IronMail from CA. since it was CipherTrust, then Secure Computing, and now CA). >It does parse AD pretty much only to prevent DHA and to It won't. I was referring to the VB script that populates the users>reject emails not in the directory, but wasn't sure if it will populate >specific AD user attributs, as indicated in this thread. signature on the client machine. Sorry if I got the reply in the wrong place. >The one thing I see, is since Outlook encrypts the email, IronMail cannot That's a fact.>open it to attach such a sig, >unless it appends it to the encrypted body. I forget if it would do that, but having IM (or anything other thanthe client) insert the signature is always a dicey proposition. What if there are multiple MIME body parts? In which do you insert the signature? For encrypted messages the signature would have to be in a separate, unencrypted, body part. >So Nope. See above. Probably put my post in as an answer to the wrong>are you saying that is what it would do? person. --- Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP In news:ek3ur4t2mho9nnsrj9pu8jjir5bg3dpie8@4ax.com, Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>, posted the following:Show quoteHide quote > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:29:49 -0400, "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Thanks for the clarification. Good point about anything other than a client > Trainer]" <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com> wrote: > > [ snip ] > >>>> Will that work with encrypted emails? One client I worked with used >>>> IronMail >>>> including for TLS, but it did not pull AD info out for sigs. >>> >>> It will if it's the one I think it is. Outlook encrypts the email >>> and Outlook inserts the signature. The signature is just some >>> additional text within the message body and it's encrypted, too. >>> --- >>> Rich Matheisen >>> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP >> >> >> Hi Rich, >> >> IronMail from CA. > > Been using Ironmail for years (I think we started with release 4.0 -- > since it was CipherTrust, then Secure Computing, and now CA). > >> It does parse AD pretty much only to prevent DHA and to >> reject emails not in the directory, but wasn't sure if it will >> populate specific AD user attributs, as indicated in this thread. > > It won't. I was referring to the VB script that populates the users > signature on the client machine. Sorry if I got the reply in the wrong > place. > >> The one thing I see, is since Outlook encrypts the email, IronMail >> cannot open it to attach such a sig, > > That's a fact. > >> unless it appends it to the encrypted body. > > I forget if it would do that, but having IM (or anything other than > the client) insert the signature is always a dicey proposition. What > if there are multiple MIME body parts? In which do you insert the > signature? For encrypted messages the signature would have to be in a > separate, unencrypted, body part. > >> So >> are you saying that is what it would do? > > Nope. See above. Probably put my post in as an answer to the wrong > person. > --- > Rich Matheisen > MCSE+I, Exchange MVP inserting a sig in an email, especially if it has mutliple MIME parts. Definitely want the client to do it. I've come to like IM, having worked with it for the past year or so. I like the one option that many other do not have, which is having a Secure Web Delivery (SWD) server for failed TLS communications. Many others (from what I've seen of our partners) simply default to non-TLS when the TLS session fails (for whatever reason whether cert checks, probs on the other end, etc). This would go against the SLA if it requires that all communication to a configured partner must be over TLS. In this case, I like IM where it will send a notification to the intended recipient with a link to the SWD for their email, and they can retrieve is over SSL. Ace On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:02:26 -0400, "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified
Trainer]" <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com> wrote: [ snip ] >Thanks for the clarification. Good point about anything other than a client Yeah, but after all these years their reporting still sux. :-(>inserting a sig in an email, especially if it has mutliple MIME parts. >Definitely want the client to do it. > >I've come to like IM, having worked with it for the past year or so. >I like If TLS is a requirement you can have IM enforce that, too (inbound and>the one option that many other do not have, which is having a Secure Web >Delivery (SWD) server for failed TLS communications. Many others (from what >I've seen of our partners) simply default to non-TLS when the TLS session >fails (for whatever reason whether cert checks, probs on the other end, >etc). This would go against the SLA if it requires that all communication to >a configured partner must be over TLS. In this case, I like IM where it will >send a notification to the intended recipient with a link to the SWD for >their email, and they can retrieve is over SSL. outbound). The default is to offer TLS on inbound connections and to use it if it's offered on outbound connections, but the default doesn't /require/ the use of TLS. --- Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP In news:4jr1s41q41c5q2cq5grp6ves1loo0ok4ic@4ax.com, Rich Matheisen [MVP] <richnews@rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM>, posted the following:> No, the default isn't, but it can be enforced. Reporting is kind of weak. > Yeah, but after all these years their reporting still sux. :-( > [snpped] > If TLS is a requirement you can have IM enforce that, too (inbound and > outbound). The default is to offer TLS on inbound connections and to > use it if it's offered on outbound connections, but the default > doesn't /require/ the use of TLS. > --- > Rich Matheisen > MCSE+I, Exchange MVP They could improve on it. Sometimes searching for emails gets to be cumbersome, espcially after I customized my console to show size, but when I did another search, it would not display it! I kind of gave up on it. Ace Hi
Cary Shultz schrieb: > We have a client (SBS2003 / MS Office 2007 running on Windows XP SP3 Longer but functional way (crypted mail will work aswell)> machines) who has a request that we provide a customized signature [...] - deploy the new Group Policy Preference to all clients - install one Vista Machine (Virtual will do its job) - install RSAT on the Vista - use the new GPMC inside RSAT on the Vista Now you can use the new GPP feature to easily deploy files and registry settings. - you can create the 3 files by script e.g. read data from AD, write it to the file(s) - create one filecopy entry, filtered by Item Level Targeting in GPP to copy them to %appdata%\Microsoft\Signatures There are a lot of alternatives, but I would not recommend a solution that is manipulating the mail on the SMTP Outgoing Event, because the crypted mails will be broken. Thats the sad reason, why configuring it on every client and the Outlook itself. Alternatives: Deploy Sig with variables by OutlookSignature.exe http://www.zerbit.de/projekte/outlooksignature.aspx Manipulating the SMTP: Q288098 SAMPLE: How to Add a Disclaimer to Outgoing SMTP Q317327 HOWTO Add a Disclaimer to Outgoing SMTP Messages in Visual Basic Q317680 HOWTO Add a Disclaimer to Outgoing SMTP Messages in Visual Basic Script .... and a lot of 3rd Party http://www.slipstick.com/addins/sig.asp Mark -- Mark Heitbrink - MVP Windows Server - Group Policy Homepage: www.gruppenrichtlinien.de - deutsch Discuss : www.freelists.org/list/gpupdate Mark,
AUSGEZEICHNET!!!!!!!! Now, the only problem that I see is the Vista part...this is a very small company and they have already "suggested" that we perform a wipe and load on two machines that *were* running Vista. I will take a look at this, though. It may be our only choice (assuming no third-party comes into play)! Thanks again! Cary Show quoteHide quote "Mark Heitbrink [MVP]" <spam-only@gruppenrichtlinien.de> wrote in message news:%23szhkPkpJHA.1288@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Hi > > Cary Shultz schrieb: >> We have a client (SBS2003 / MS Office 2007 running on Windows XP SP3 >> machines) who has a request that we provide a customized signature [...] > > Longer but functional way (crypted mail will work aswell) > - deploy the new Group Policy Preference to all clients > - install one Vista Machine (Virtual will do its job) > - install RSAT on the Vista > - use the new GPMC inside RSAT on the Vista > > Now you can use the new GPP feature to easily deploy files and > registry settings. > > - you can create the 3 files by script > e.g. read data from AD, write it to the file(s) > - create one filecopy entry, filtered by Item Level Targeting in GPP > to copy them to %appdata%\Microsoft\Signatures > > There are a lot of alternatives, but I would not recommend a solution > that is manipulating the mail on the SMTP Outgoing Event, because the > crypted mails will be broken. > Thats the sad reason, why configuring it on every client and the > Outlook itself. > > Alternatives: > Deploy Sig with variables by OutlookSignature.exe > http://www.zerbit.de/projekte/outlooksignature.aspx > > Manipulating the SMTP: > Q288098 SAMPLE: How to Add a Disclaimer to Outgoing SMTP > Q317327 HOWTO Add a Disclaimer to Outgoing SMTP Messages in Visual Basic > Q317680 HOWTO Add a Disclaimer to Outgoing SMTP Messages in Visual Basic > Script > > ... and a lot of 3rd Party > http://www.slipstick.com/addins/sig.asp > > Mark > -- > Mark Heitbrink - MVP Windows Server - Group Policy > > Homepage: www.gruppenrichtlinien.de - deutsch > Discuss : www.freelists.org/list/gpupdate In news:%23$SJGbkpJHA.4516@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, Cary Shultz <cshu***@outsourceit.com>, posted the following:> Mark, I think so far, Mark's suggestion seems to be the best bet, since it applies > > AUSGEZEICHNET!!!!!!!! > > Now, the only problem that I see is the Vista part...this is a very > small company and they have already "suggested" that we perform a > wipe and load on two machines that *were* running Vista. I will take > a look at this, though. > It may be our only choice (assuming no third-party comes into play)! > > Thanks again! > the sig to the email prior to sending it. Ace Agreed...but I think that we are going to have a hard time with the Vista
machine....they have already removed Vista from two machines....I will speak with our POC to see if she will go for it.....or pay for a third party. But, this has piqued my interest. I am now viewing this as a challenge to avoid paying for third-party software! I can see trouble in my future....my Boss does not like it when I feel 'challenged'!. We are a Managed Services company so there is a 'fix cost' associated with each client (hate to look at it that way...). Me spending x number of hours on something because of a challenge kinda throws everything off kilter! I am sure that I will hear about it! I will keep you informed! Show quoteHide quote "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]" <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:uEUCqqmpJHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > In news:%23$SJGbkpJHA.4516@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, > Cary Shultz <cshu***@outsourceit.com>, posted the following: >> Mark, >> >> AUSGEZEICHNET!!!!!!!! >> >> Now, the only problem that I see is the Vista part...this is a very >> small company and they have already "suggested" that we perform a >> wipe and load on two machines that *were* running Vista. I will take >> a look at this, though. >> It may be our only choice (assuming no third-party comes into play)! >> >> Thanks again! >> > > I think so far, Mark's suggestion seems to be the best bet, since it > applies the sig to the email prior to sending it. > > Ace > In news:%23hhTu8npJHA.6096@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, Cary Shultz <cshu***@outsourceit.com>, posted the following:Show quoteHide quote > Agreed...but I think that we are going to have a hard time with the We wouldn't want any kilters! :-)> Vista machine....they have already removed Vista from two > machines....I will speak with our POC to see if she will go for > it.....or pay for a third party. > But, this has piqued my interest. I am now viewing this as a > challenge to avoid paying for third-party software! I can see > trouble in my future....my Boss does not like it when I feel > 'challenged'!. We are a Managed Services company so there is a 'fix > cost' associated with each client (hate to look at it that way...). Me > spending x number of hours on something because of a challenge > kinda throws everything off kilter! I am sure that I will hear about > it! > I will keep you informed! > Maybe I'm not following the removing Vista portion, since I thought we are talking about Outlook and creating a GPO with mutiple settings (one for each Outlook ADM), and this type of setting only apply to users and not computers? Did I miss something? Ace In news:e$pu8kqpJHA.1172@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer] <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com>, posted the following: Never mind, forgot it was Preferences we were talking about and need the RSAT on a Vista SP1 machine to make it work. :-) AceNo worries......we can not see and remember *everything*!
Show quoteHide quote "Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]" <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Oja7v0qpJHA.4516@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > In news:e$pu8kqpJHA.1172@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, > Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer] <firstnamelastn***@hotmail.com>, > posted the following: > > Never mind, forgot it was Preferences we were talking about and need the > RSAT on a Vista SP1 machine to make it work. > > :-) > > Ace > > In news:OTmrefxpJHA.5424@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl, Cary Shultz <cshu***@outsourceit.com>, posted the following:> No worries......we can not see and remember *everything*! Sometimes I get "CRS" - can't remember stuff! LOLAce |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics